2012-01-24T14:32:00.003+05:30

Fundamental Theory Of Existence.

1. Zero can not exist as denominator.

2. Anything can not be created out of nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere.

3. Anything can not be destroyed into nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere.

4. Existence of anything can not be infinite.

5. There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World.

6. There are finite absolute laws.

7. Velocity of light is relative.

8. There are three dimensions and three dimensions only.

9. Time Travel is impossible.

10. Tan 90 can not exist.

11. God(s) can not exist.

Fundamental Theory Of Existence.

What is infinite? Infinite = Not finite. Any number, however large or small is always finite. So, no number is ever infinite. Numbers are infinite. Numbers being infinite is one of the properties of the numbers. Numbers don't have physical existence. Undefined or Not defined means it has no definite solution. When you divide any number with zero it can never be said as Undefined. Why? The Deadliest Weapon is... Why? When you place an Apple and eat it then you can say there is no Apple on the table. That is... There is nothing on the table! Zero = Nothing. If Zero is Mathematics and, Nothing is English and, Nothingness is Physics then how can I say... THEY ARE CONNECTED! Mathematics is some form of Truth or Law. Also English and Physics are some forms of Truth and Laws. The M, E and, P words are different names but they are all truths or laws governing the World or Universe. So " nothing " is not just an M or E or P word, it is all! When you say ( Apple/Zero ) then you mean Apple destroyed into Zero. How? 1/2 means 1 cut into 2. So, 1/0 means 1 cut into 0. If 1 Apple can be cut into 0 or if 0 can give birth to 1 Apple then 1/0 has an answer but, it is not possible. The answer to 1/0 is not Undefined, it is Impossible. So, 1/0 is impossible. It is said that 0/0 is Indeterminate... Is it so? How? Why not? No, it is not indeterminate. And, why is it so? Because, when you divide with anything then the denominator is given the first preference... it is not just preference, it is the truth or common sense or logic. Anything divided by 0 is said to be 0. And, it is true because 0 in the numerator means you have nothing to divide. So, you are not given the Apple in the first place. How can you eat an Apple if you don't have any? So, what is 0/0 then? When you are dividing some number with another number then the number that acts as the denominator is the first thing that is important, not the other way around. So, when you are asked to divide an Apple into two parts you don't say... here... take this two Apples! It is, two halves of the 1 Apple. So, division of an Apple into zero parts is impossible. And, 0/0 doesn't mean you have nothing to divide, it means you can't divide anything ( even 0 ) into 0 parts. When you say 0/0, there are no two things such as...

First thing: 0 in the numerator meaning " Nothing to divide "...

Second thing: 0 in the denominator meaning " Divide the numerator into nothing ".

The " Second thing " is the correct answer. Why? Because, 1/2 doesn't mean 1/2 = 1! It means 1/2 = 0.5. So, the denominator is the first thing that is to be used. Therefore...

1. Zero can not exist as denominator.

The fact that the numerator can not be divided into zero parts means anything that exists can not be destroyed into nothingness. And the fact that sum of zeroes gives us zero alone means anything that does not exist can not be given existence out of nothingness. Therefore...

2. Anything can not be created out of nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere.

3. Anything can not be destroyed into nothingness, only change of form is possible and change is everywhere.

Once again we need to know what infinite means. What does infinite mean? Infinite means not finite and not finite means unlimited. By now we know that creation and destruction are impossible. If creation is impossible then there is no other way new things can add up to the World that already exists. If new things can not add up to the World then there is no way anything that exists in this World can be infinite. Space can not be infinite. Anything that has physical existence can't be infinite. Space has physical existence. Numbers don't have physical existence. The word Apple doesn't have physical existence but the edible Apple in your hand has physical existence and the edible Apples in your hands can't be infinite. Also, Time is never Absolute, it is always Relative and, it has no physical existence. Time is a measure of Change and sometimes Change is a turn of events, events can be numbered to an extent and, existence of more than one event of the same part of World or Universe is impossible. So, Time can never be infinite. Therefore...

4. Existence of anything can not be infinite.

Numbers are infinite but number of apples ( existence ) can not be infinite. Now, we know that creation and destruction are impossible and we also know that the existence of anything can not be infinite. We are part of the world we live in. In our world existence of anything can not be infinite. That is Space, Mass, Energy, Density, Gravity, Force,... etc; can not be infinite. Also, in our World creation and destruction are impossible. Creation is impossible means no new things can add up to the World that already exists and it also means what already exists can not come out of creation. Creation is impossible, creation is completely ruled out. We also know that destruction of the World is impossible. Space is timeless. Therefore...

5. There is no beginning and an end to the existence of the World.

According to the fourth postulate space can not be infinite and according to the fifth postulate space is timeless.

We know what an equation means. An equation is a law of equity. If creation and destruction are possible then all laws have to fail. In a World where creation and destruction are possible laws can not exist, only Chaos exists. We know what infinity means. Infinity means not finite and it means infinity is something that is unlimited, something that is ever increasing. Positive infinity is ever increasing and negative infinity is ever decreasing. Infinity means unlimited and it can not be used in equations. If creation is possible, equations will fail. Therefore...

6. There are finite absolute laws.

Where Albert Einstein went wrong... Proof of Velocity of Light being Relative to Gravity.

Albert Einstein:

Special Relativity Theory

1. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial (=non-

accelerating) reference frames,

and

2. The speed of light in free space is constant.

General Theory of Relativity

Clocks which are far from massive bodies (or at higher

gravitational potentials) run faster, and clocks close to

massive bodies (or at lower gravitational potentials) run

slower. This is because gravitational time dilation is

manifested in accelerated frames of reference or, by virtue of

the equivalence principle, in the gravitational field of massive

objects.

Albert Einstein in his Special Theory of Relativity said that Velocity of Light is Constant in Free Space. That is, Velocity of Light is Constant on the Surface of the Earth or on the Surface of the Moon. But, it's not so. I beg to differ on it and here is my explanation.

Ordinary body is measured in terms of MASS.

Total Energy is equal to the Sum of Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy.

For ordinary body

Gravity is Directly Proportional to Change in Velocity per Time.

Velocity of Light is constant when it is measured on the surface of the Earth i.e; it's Constant where ever there is No Considerable Change in Gravity.

What happens when the Velocity of the Same Light ( Same Source, Same Conditions - Except Gravity ) is measured on the Surface of the Earth and on the Surface of the Moon?

According to Albert Einstein it must be Constant. But, I beg to differ. It's not constant and here is why?!

For ordinary body we have " MASS " but when it comes to

LIGHT we have " ENERGY/MASS " since Energy = Product of Mass and Velocity Square. E=m c(square).

P.E=mgh

P.E is Directly Proportional to mgh

m mass

g gravity

h height or distance

P.E/m is proportional to gh

where h=vt

P.E/mvt proportional to g

For ordinary body

g is proportional to v/t

For Light

g is proportional to E/mvt, since Light is a form of energy with mass

Let's take t ( Time ) as constant?! On different places such as Surface of the Earth and, Surface of the Moon... Gravity is different... If Gravity is different Changes are different and Change is a measure of Time. So, Time is not constant or same on different places such as Earth and Moon. But, it doesn't differ by much.

So when it's ordinary body...

1. Gravity is directly proportional to Change in Velocity.

But, when we take Light into account...

2. Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity [ Gravity is proportional to E/mv i.e; Change in Gravity leads to Change in Velocity of Light ]. As gravity increases velocity of light decreases and when gravity is lesser then the velocity of light is more when compared to a location where gravity is more...

So, Velocity of Light on Earth is lesser than Velocity of Light on Moon.

For ordinary body

Acceleration is directly proportional to Velocity ( When Gravity increases Velocity of a free falling object increases... and, when it comes to Light

Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity... So, as Gravity increases Velocity of Light decreases. Why? Because, Light is a product of both Energy and Mass unlike an ordinary body which is a product of Mass alone.

So, as Gravity increases Velocity of Light decreases.

So velocity of Light is more in space ( where there is little gravity ) and on the Moon ( where the Gravity is lesser than that on the Earth ) when compared to Velocity of Light on Earth.

Also in Space

P.E = Gm1m2/r

and

g = Gm/r square

And, this results in

So when it's ordinary body...

1. Gravity is directly proportional to Change in Velocity.

But, when we take Light into account...

2. Gravity is inversely proportional to Velocity [ Gravity is proportional to E/mv i.e; Change in Gravity leads to Change in Velocity of Light ].

When we take E/m into consideration...

g is inversely proportional to v.

Here is a better explanation...

E = m c square

So, for light

g t = E/mc

g t is inversely proportional to c

and,

for ordinary body ( ordinary body in a sense mass is

taken into consideration unlike mass and energy for light )

For a Body of mass m

g t = v

g t is directly proportional to v

For any body with Energy/Mass

g t = E/mv

g t is inversely proportional to v

According to Albert Einstein's

Special Theory Of Relativity...

Velocity of light is constant in free space

and,

According to General Theory Of Relativity...

it is relative when there is difference in gravity.

That is... When Clocks run slower ( When Time is relatively lower ) i.e; when Gravity is more Velocity of light is lesser... similarly it is more when gravity is lesser.

g t = E/mc

That is... gt inversely proportional to c.

According to Albert Einstein Velocity of light depends upon Gravity-Time but not Relativistic Mass. Therefore, it is same/constant on a moving Train and on Land. Where as it varies where there is change in Gravity-Time.

Actually Light has RELATIVISTIC MASS... And, that is why I say it varies with Gravity.

For a Body of mass m

g t = v

g t is directly proportional to v

Light...

E = m c square

So, for light

g t = E/mc

g t is inversely proportional to c

Therefore, velocity of light is relative not just because of General Theory Of Relativity but also due to the fact that light has relativistic mass and anything with greater E/m value than light can travel faster than light. Velocity of light is relative because of Gravity-Time ( Clocks running faster or slower) and also because Gravity attracts light ( Relativistic mass ).

Why is it that the velocity of light is same on both the Train and on Land?

The reason is... When you carry an Apple with you on a moving train then the Apple has the train's velocity and it has no velocity on land. And, when you carry light! Carry light? When you have a source of light on a train and on land velocity of light is observed to be one and the same and, it is because we don't carry light, we don't get hold of light, we carry light source but not light. Light is generated at the source and it travels on its own. Therefore velocity of light is observed to be constant in free space. But, Light can't escape the Train called Gravity. When Light travels through the Train called Gravity it has a

( both because of General Theory Of Relativity and due to Gravity attraction of Relativistic Mass )

relative velocity. In light's case gravity is inversely proportional to its velocity. Velocity of light is constant in free space and is relative with respect to change in gravity both due to General Theory Of Relativity and also due to its Relativistic Mass. To prove it, we need to prove that something in this World/Universe can travel faster than light. That is... Faster than the predefined value

299792458 metres per second.

Therefore...

7. Velocity of light is relative.

Theory Of Everything? Watch ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Strc2zRShXc ).

Theory Of Everything

What does this video contain?

Here it is...

[1.] Theory of Everything?

Is String Theory really a theory of everything?

Why not?

[2.] According to different string theories there are 10 or 11 spatial dimensions.

[3.] The truth is there are three and three dimensions only.

Refer to:

http://sagargorijala.blogspot.com/

[4.] Time = Change

Time is a measure of change.

[5.] It is said that time is the 4th dimension.

[6.] Time has no physical existence.

[7.] There are 3 length and 1 time dimensions.

[8.] What about more than 3 length/spatial dimensions? 10 length/spatial dimensions? 11 length/spatial dimensions?

[9.] We sometimes study different parameters in 1 dimension and sometimes in 2 dimensions and also in 3 and 4 dimensions.

[10.] Let us not talk about the time dimension.

So here is what we have...

3 length/spatial dimensions.

[11.] Is there anything in this World/Universe that is 1 dimensional? 1D? Really?

[12.] The moment of truth...

[13.] There is no such thing as 1D and 1D only...

We simply neglect the other 2 length/spatial Ds.

[14.] So...

There is no such thing as1D only

2D only...

[15.] It is always 3D and 3D only.

We simply neglect other Ds for our convenience.

[16.] What about 10Ds and 11Ds???

[17.] The 3 Ds are mutually perpendicular to each other.

[18.] If there are 10Ds or 11Ds... Wait! Let us talk about 4Ds only... Just for now!

[19.] If 4th D does not exist, that leaves us with the answer: No 10 or 11 Ds.

[20.] Now, to prove that 4th D does not exist.

[21.] Here is the proof...

[22.] The 3Ds are mutually perpendicular. If there is another D, 4th D then it will be mutually perpendicular to the measurable 3Ds?

[23.] No way.

[24.] So, There is no 4th D.

[25.] If there is a 4th D then what?

[26.] Let us take a look at the World if there is a 4th D.

[27.] Density=(Mass/Volume)

[28.] The formulae for Volume is different for different 3D objects... Basically the formula is...

[29.] Basically... Volume=Length x Breadth x HeightVolume = 1st D x 2nd D x 3rd D.

[30.] We know that Earth revolves around the Sun in 3Ds and if there is a 4th D then...

[31.] If there is a 4th D then Density, Mass, Volume, Energy, Space and everything else change!!! Yes, EVERYTHING changes!!!

[32.] So the 4th D... 1. Can not be mutually perpendicular? 2. It can not be measured? 3. It can not have a visual effect on Earth -- Sun relationship?

[33.] There is no 4th D Or More...

[34.] We know that Energy, Mass, and others have 1. Units and 2. Dimensions

[35.] If String Theory says... There are more than 3 length/spatial Ds then it is wrong.

[36.] If 3Ds are length/spatial, 4th D is time and other Ds ( 10 or 11 ) are Energy or Mass or something else then String Theory is really the Theory Of Everything. TOE.

[37.] Therefore... There are 3 and 3 only length/spatial Ds.

[38. LAST] Thanks for your valuable time, patience and undivided attention. Thanks again. Have a nice day/night!Goodbye.

Song:

Love Connects.mp3

Download it from mediafire:

http://www.mediafire.com/?6zyi35sv9fexcwb

Size:

428.57 KB

My Theory:

http://sagargorijala.blogspot.com/

My E-mail:

nimzosagar@yahoo.co.uk

Everything is well defined in three dimensions. Space too is three dimensional. String Theory claims more than three dimensions. Time is an imaginary dimension. Time is a measure of Change. There are three and only three Length/Spatial dimensions and one Time dimension. Existence of anything short of three dimensions is impossible since anything that exists can not be destroyed into nothingness. If more than three dimensions can exist, they have to exist everywhere and always. Since anything can not be created out of nothingness more than three dimensions can not be given existence out of nothingness. Therefore String Theory can not be true. Therefore anything short of three dimensions and more than three dimensions is impossible. Therefore...

8. There are three dimensions and three dimensions only.

Time travel! How do you define it? Can we go to past? If Past=Memory then we can possibly go to past. If going to past is like travelling from a city to a village then time travel is possible! May be going to past is possible depending upon how you define PAST. If Past is a physical World/Universe that is the precursor of the Present World/Universe then Time Travel is impossible. It is not only impossible but also meaningless. Why? Because, the so called Past World/Universe has changed into Present World/Universe and it is not two or more copies of The World... Thus, Time Travel is only a story or just another day dream! What about Future? Also Future is not another copy! So, it is also not possible. Wait! Is that all? Didn't I tell you... Time is a measure of Change. So more Gravity means slower changes and two places with different gravity will have different time or clock... Is that you call Time Travel? Really? Think twice! If so, Time Travel is indeed a reality and it is something that all Life has always experienced. How? Gravity is not the same everywhere... So, we have gone to places with varying gravity and thus we have made that amazing trip... The TRIP, The so called Time Travel Trip. There are no infinite parallel Worlds with infinite parallel changes and we can not Time Travel. Time Travel is meaningless. Therefore...

9. Time Travel is impossible.

Tan 90 is same as 1/0. The first and the tenth postulates are one and the same! Therefore...

10. Tan 90 can not exist.

God(s) can not create and God(s) can not destroy and God(s) can not change laws.

God(s) can not create laws and also can not destroy laws...

Therefore God(s) can not exist. Therefore...

11. God(s) can not exist.

Who or What am I? I'm just a variation! A Life form! Any doubt? Just kidding. Please do laugh. I mean... Laugh for my sake! I am watching! I'm worried... You know why? I'm no good at jokes. So, please do laugh. There are unlimited variations.

Name: Sagar Gorijala

Mobile : 9492511174 ( B.S.N.L )

and

8977548558 ( TATA DOCOMO )

Mobile

S.T.D code: 0 ( In India - Out of Andhra Pradesh )

I.S.D code: +91 ( Out side India )

Address:

Sagar Gorijala, S/O Dr.G.Sambasiva Rao, Old Teaching Staff Quarters no. 107, G.S.L Medical College, N.H-5, Lakshmipuram, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India, 533294.

Permanent Address:

Sagar Gorijala,

S/O Dr.G.Sambasiva Rao,

Tirunetralayam, Near R.T.C BusStand,

Nandigama, Krishna District,

Andhra Pradesh,

India,

Pin code: 521185.

E-mail: nimzosagar@yahoo.co.uk

EMAIL FROM TATE GARRINGER.

I received an e-mail from Tate Garringer and I'm very happy to receive such an email and here is my reply ( I altered this message to include few simple points which are for your better understanding... ).

Thanks for mailing me and you are right Gravity can bend Space ( I never understood why Gravity bends Space... What is Space? What is Nothingness? What is Vacuum? Are FREE SPACE, NOTHINGNESS AND VACUUM connected in any way? ) and I need to change that part of my theory but I disagree with you on " Light's velocity is constant ". When you throw a stone from a moving bus or train you can see that the stone gathers velocity of the bus or train and when you switch on a source of light then what happens? Light doesn't get faster! Yes, that's true. But, why? Simple...Light doesn't travel with bus or train it is produced from the source and then it travels, it simply has nothing to do with velocity of bus or train. Gravity has its effect on everything...yes, everything. Light is no exception. What do we understand from Albert Michelson and Edward Morley experiment? They proved that " ETHER " doesn't exist and they got a Nobel prize for it. Albert Einstein stated that light's velocity of light is relative in his world famous theory and then he didn't mention why?! He did say that gravity bends space and light when travels in bent space appears to be bent. But, what does that have to do with light's velocity being constant? Actually I forgot why and I have to do some research on it and I would be very happy if you can shed some light upon the situation. Why is it that the light's velocity appears to be constant and the velocity of other bodies relative? Simple... we don't get hold of light and you do know that it's not the case with other bodies. I mean... we don't catch or hold light! Why is it that the velocity of light is measured constant on ground or on the surface of the earth but the velocity of the other bodies vary? Because light is a form of energy and it's not completely energy. What does the world famous equation Energy equals to product of Mass and Velocity of Light square say? What does the equation of Kinetic Energy say? Kinetic Energy is equal to Half of the product of Mass of the body and square of the Velocity of the body. Both these equations point out the fact that Mass, Energy and Velocity or not one and the same but are connected and cause one and the same effect on the body or light. What is light? Does light have any mass? If light has mass what is it called? Is it called relativistic mass or intrinsic mass? Or both the same? Any way light is connected to mass, energy and velocity and these inturn are connected to gravity. Everything is connected. Everything is connected. Everything is connected. I repeat, EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED. And, this doesn't mean EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED IN EVERY WAY, EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED IN SOME WAY OR THE OTHER. If you take a vessel and fill it with sand you can see that the sand particle on top of the other sand particle is there because of the other sand particles are lying below... that is... one sand particle's occupation of a particular place is responsible for the position of the other sand particle lying above! This is an example of... EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED. Gravity can bend space, light and what not! But, how? Why do we measure the velocity of light to be constant on the surface of the earth where as the velocities of all other bodies vary? Simple... other bodies are masses, have potential energy but are not forms of energy where as light has mass and is a form of energy so where ever the gravity value doesn't vary the velocity of light doesn't vary. So how do you prove it? Simple... measure velocity of light on Moon or somewhere other than the surface of the Earth, where there is considerable change in gravity and holla! what do you get? We can see the difference in velocity of light that is measured on the moon's surface from that measured on the surface of the earth. Yes, that right. The velocity of light depends upon energy, mass and gravity and it's measured to be constant where ever there is no change in gravity. Albert Einstein stated that velocity of light is constant and that means we should get same value for velocity of light on the surface of the earth and on the surface of the moon... and that's not the complete story...he stated that gravity bends space so light traveling in a straight line appears to be bent. Yes, he's right gravity does bend space but he didn't say light is slowed down in bent space. Yes if space is bent... then light traveling in the bent space behaves differently?! Bent space doesn't alter the properties of light but it actually produces effects such as gravity lensing and it's observed and proved? The only way to prove my postulate is to measure velocity of light on the surface of the earth and on the surface of the moon and find out if it's any different from one another.

Time travel: You said that time travel is possible and it's proved. But, what's is time travel? Gravity bends space and what does it do to time? Remember? Everything is connected. When gravity increases changes take place slowly and what does that mean? Time is a measure of change. Time is relative and it can be zero but change is permanent and when we say change is zero it refers to some base value or assumption. Change or time have no beginning and no end. The time we measure using clocks are relative and can be zero and can vary from each other but the change that's universal is not zero and that means time of the world/universe is never zero. Then why is time relative and what does... time is zero... mean? Gravity and time are related. But, how? Gravity attracts and this attraction slows change in everything and that means ---> more gravity slow change or slow time. Got it? What is time travel? How can time travel exist? If you change the meaning of time travel then you can say time travel is possible other wise time travel is not only impossible but also meaning less. That is... It all depends upon how you define time travel. There exists one and only one World/Universe and it's always changing and there is no substitute to it... So how can you go back or further in time when there is only one such world? I agree with you that there are four but not three dimensions... Three Space and One Time ( Dimensions ). What I proved is... There are three and three only ( Length/Spatial Dimensions ). And now, The big question is... What God or Gods have to do with XY=1? XY=1 is a Equilateral/Rectangular Hyperbola and it's an example and only an example to prove my theory... I mean... 10 postulates in my theory. If you don't understand XY=1... then please mail me again and I'll explain how and why!?

From: Tate Garringer

To: nimzosagar@yahoo.co.uk

Friday, 25 February 2011 9:35 AM

"Fundamental Theory of Everything"

tategarringer@gmail.com

This was posted about 5 months ago and I had some discrepancies that I felt an urge to discuss with you in hopes that you might be able to clarify your ideas.Firstly, You said stated the the velocity of light is relative. Now, I didn't understand when directly after you stated that Einstein was incorrect about the ability of space-time to bend flexibly and here is why: If space-time cannot be bent then there is no relativity to lightspeed, thus, lightspeed would be constant. Light is bent by intense gravity and gravity is generated by objects with large mass. Mass bends space in a sort of "pinched" formation. As you get closer to a massive object, space is bent more and more, proportional to the object. This bend in space and time would be a direct cause of your relative velocity, and so it seems you contradict yourself. And while I'm at it, I may as well tell you that the speed of light IS indeed constant, only slowed through different media such as liquid and gas. Pretty much regardless of where you go, light will travel at about 300,000 m/s(s). Second, Time travel is entirely possible, it's already been done in very small increments. Read up on Time Dialation. Time travel to the past is thought to be very unlikely though. Never say never! Thirdly, time is a defined dimension. And fourth, what does this have to do with a god? If you already no matter is neither created nor destroyed then your search is over. No gods. I appreciate your time and hope for a response!

-Tate Garringer.